Search for: "Comstock Correctional"
Results 1 - 20
of 130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2010, 7:21 am
Could any decision illustrate this proposition better than Comstock? [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:45 pm
The majority in Comstock seems to adopt this approach.Why is Comstock a collective action issue? [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 11:56 am
UPDATE: I have corrected a typo in the title of the post. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 12:07 am
Comstock, on behalf of the Cato Institute and co-blogger Randy Barnett. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:00 pm
It is enough that there is an evil at hand for correction, and that it might be thought that the particular legislative measure was a rational way to correct it. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:43 pm
Notably, the government did not defend his position in its briefs in Comstock. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 10:09 pm
Comstock opinion. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
" I suppose the second half of that sentence could be technically correct, but only in a way that totally undercuts the opinion's conclusion with respect to standing: there's no conflict of interest because the plaintiff physicians have no patients who could possibly be harmed by mifepristone.The closest that Judge Kacsmaryk comes to explaining how doctors who don't prescribe mifepristone could be harmed by its FDA approval is through a flight of fancy. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 12:31 pm
I think that is just simply not correct. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:07 am
Comstock, and Levin v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
You're certainly not the only one shackled by these norms, and I don't blame you with the way our educational system is focused so rigidly on "correct answers" and standardized testing. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 5:29 pm
Both refused to issue any correction. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 8:29 am
Comstock The Fourth Circuit unanimously affirmed the district court's decision that 18 U.S.C. 4248 of the Adam Walsh Act is ... [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:00 am
The City says the two officers were better qualified than plaintiff.Stamford describes legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for selecting both Comstock and Malanga. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am
Congressional failure to "correct" a Supreme Court ruling (or a string of rulings by the lower courts that gain prominence) does not necessarily signal congressional acquiescence. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 6:27 pm
Comstock, 2007 WL 2588815 (E.D.N.C.), was brought to my attention by a friend, who believed it had received insufficient attention in the press. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 6:03 am
Comstock. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 5:19 am
Correct, there ain’t one. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm
Greenhouse may also be correct in her speculation that the deciding vote will ultimately be cast by Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 10:08 am
2) I don’t find myself persuaded by Ilya’s reading of Comstock. [read post]
